🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to resume nuclear negotiations with the United States as long as it is treated with "respect" and "honor", Iran's foreign minister has declared.

Abbas Araghchi stated only diplomacy produced results, and revealed recent overtures had come from go-betweens to reopen negotiations with the Trump administration. He asserted Iran had zero undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran was not yet able to authorize the global atomic watchdog to inspect struck enrichment centers for safety concerns.

Walking a Challenging Path

Araghchi is navigating a difficult route since Iran wishes not to be seen to be proceeding from a situation of weakness, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had arisen more resilient militarily and mentally from the coordinated strike on its atomic facilities in June.

He was addressing at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to process nuclear material on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the key factor of the impasse in the earlier negotiations.

Prior Discussions Abruptly Terminated

The earlier sessions of talks between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and acrimonious end on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a two-week conflict that culminated with Donald Trump declaring the facilities had been obliterated. Following this, EU nations exercised their right to reinstate global restrictions, but Iran asserts they have not had a substantial consequence.

Perfect Agreement Suggested

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the enrichment issue in previous talks, when it was decided an domestic cooperative with US participation could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be confident that Iran's enrichment initiative was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been agreed in the negotiations that American atomic experts could operate inside Iran, but that was a logical implication of the consortium proposal. Representatives claimed repeatedly they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy the American negotiator only for the arrangement to collapse due to "spoilers in Washington".

Current Status

Tehran representatives said the cooperative arrangement was now withdrawn, but it seems highly likely the proposal could be resurrected in various formats if negotiations reopen.

The US president in recent days said he had been receiving messages that Iran desired to restart talks, but privately Tehran representatives state they are not yet getting clear proposals from America either straightforwardly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of passivity in the face of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran says negotiations is not part of a show.

Diplomatic Stance

In his remarks to the conference, aimed to depict the US as a dominant force that exploits the concept of global regulations, the foreign minister declared the 12-day war revealed the conflict could not be resolved by military means. He asserted the assaults started with a Washington's ultimatum for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is convinced the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with full US knowledge and collaboration, making confidence challenging to restore.

Negotiations Stays the Final Answer

The foreign minister said: "It was not Iran that had abandoned diplomacy; it was the United States and the European states that had repeatedly sought to enforce their desires during the negotiations. Dialogue can still be viable and remains the ultimate answer to address disagreements, but its standards, regulations and principles must be adhered to."

"In case they address to the Iranian people with the tone of respect and honor, they will obtain a answer in the equivalent tone."

Repair and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of repair and recovery, Araghchi stated he was confident Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We learned multiple understandings from this war; we have come to know our internal vulnerabilities and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He stated: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our nuclear technology, which they aimed to eliminate, continues to exist. The sites and machinery, if eliminated, will be rebuilt; what is important is the resolve of the Iranian people and then the social solidarity that they aimed at, but failed to break. The nation of Iran have become stronger, more integrated, and more endorsing of the administration and the nation in the face of this assault."